News

Ebola Guide

Ebola in East Africa: Beyond the Medical Crisis

A Travel Risk Management Perspective on the Current Outbreak By Travel Risk Academy | 28 May 2026 Expert review by Jennifer Milton, CEO of Compass Point Assist, and Thierry Montrieux, Founder of Summit Consulting When the World Health Organisation declared the ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on 17 May 2026, most headlines focused on case numbers and death rates. As Jennifer Milton, CEO of Compass Point Assist, reminds us: “Outbreaks like this very quickly become far more than purely ‘medical’ events. In reality, they rapidly evolve into operational, continuity, assistance, and duty of care challenges as well.” This is the perspective organisations with personnel in East Africa need right now – not just the epidemiology, but the operational reality of what this outbreak means for students, NGO staff, expatriates, and the institutions responsible for their safety. The Current Situation: What We Know As of late May 2026, official data show that the outbreak has escalated significantly from early reports. Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) Around 105 laboratory-confirmed cases Around 900+ suspected cases Over 200 deaths (suspected and confirmed) Affected provinces include Ituri, North Kivu, and South Kivu Uganda 7 laboratory-confirmed cases, all in or linked to Kampala 1 confirmed death All cases linked to travel from DRC rather than sustained community spread WHO situation reporting also notes that, by mid‑May, a combined total of several hundred suspected cases and over a hundred deaths had already been reported across both countries, underlining how fast the outbreak has grown from initial detection. Laboratory capacity remains limited in some affected areas, so many cases remain classified as “suspected” pending confirmation. Public health experts warn the true scale may be higher than official figures due to delayed detection, insecurity, and population movement across porous borders. What Makes This Outbreak Different This outbreak involves Bundibugyo virus, a less common Ebola species that has not caused a major outbreak in over a decade. Two features are particularly important for organisations: There are no licensed vaccines specifically approved for Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD). There are no approved strain-specific antiviral treatments, although experimental vaccines and therapeutics are under development. Historical data from previous Bundibugyo outbreaks suggest a case fatality rate of roughly 30–50%, with outcomes heavily influenced by rapid identification, supportive medical care, and robust infection prevention and control. However, there is a crucial piece of context often missing from outbreak reporting: “Ebola is significantly less transmissible than airborne respiratory diseases because spread requires direct contact with infected body fluids.” — Thierry Montrieux, Summit Consulting Ebola does not spread through the air in the same way as COVID‑19, influenza, measles, or tuberculosis. Transmission requires direct contact with infectious bodily fluids from a symptomatic person. For most travellers and personnel who avoid direct contact with sick individuals, healthcare settings treating Ebola patients, and funeral activities, the overall risk of infection remains low. The Operational Reality: Beyond Direct Exposure From a travel risk and business continuity perspective, the real impact extends far beyond those directly exposed to the virus. As Jennifer Milton notes: “Even personnel not directly exposed to Ebola may still be heavily impacted operationally through overwhelmed healthcare systems, movement restrictions, border measures, misinformation, staffing issues, and reduced local infrastructure capability.” Thierry Montrieux of Summit Consulting adds another layer to this: “From a travel risk management standpoint, the real question is not only ‘How many cases?’ but ‘How quickly will this overwhelm local systems, and what does that mean for access, movement, and decision-making on the ground?’” In practical terms, organisations may face: 1. Medical Access Disruption Healthcare systems in affected areas may divert resources to Ebola response, reducing capacity for routine and emergency care. Non-Ebola patients may experience longer waits, fewer available beds, and delays in diagnostic tests. Access to medications, specialist care, and elective procedures may be constrained. 2. Movement and Border Complications Enhanced screening at airports and borders (temperature checks, health declarations) can create delays and uncertainty. Internal checkpoints and movement restrictions may disrupt road travel and logistics. Regional flights and cross-border operations may be rescheduled, rerouted, or suspended on short notice. 3. Medical Evacuation Constraints This is an area where Thierry’s expertise is especially relevant: “Medical evacuation for suspected or confirmed Ebola cases may be severely restricted and requires specialist arrangements.” — Thierry Montrieux, Summit Consulting Standard air ambulance services may refuse suspected or confirmed infectious disease cases. Specialist isolation-capable aircraft are limited and expensive. Destination countries and receiving hospitals may decline to accept cases, even with insurance in place. The ability to evacuate a sick staff member cannot be assumed; it must be planned and verified. 4. Staffing and Continuity Challenges Heightened anxiety may drive staff to seek reassignment or early return. Family concerns can influence personnel decisions, especially for students and NGO staff. Quarantine or monitoring requirements can affect staffing levels even where infection risk is low. 5. Communications and Misinformation Conflicting media reports and social media rumours can undermine confidence in organisational decisions. Stigma associated with Ebola may affect team dynamics and community relationships. Organisations must provide regular, factual updates to counter fear-based narratives. What Organisations Should Do Now From a TRA standpoint, this is the “preparedness window” – the moment to act before pressure peaks. Review Medical Referral Pathways Identify which facilities in your areas of operation are designated Ebola treatment centres and which are available for non‑Ebola care. Map reliable local providers for urgent but non‑Ebola concerns (injuries, chronic conditions, routine emergencies). Clarify how staff or students should access care out of hours or in remote locations. Confirm Medical Evacuation Arrangements Speak directly with your medical assistance/evacuation providers about infectious disease capabilities. Confirm: Whether suspected Ebola cases are covered What aircraft and isolation equipment are available Which destination hospitals will accept such cases Likely timelines, approvals, and costs Build plans for scenarios in which medevac is delayed, declined, or not viable. Establish Clear Escalation and Decision Thresholds Define what triggers changes in operations: e.g. new cases

Ebola in East Africa: Beyond the Medical Crisis Read More »

TRA Guide

Why smaller NGOs and universities deserve travel risk management built for them

A Q&A with Patience Ogunruku, TRA Mentor Most travel risk support has been built for big corporates with big budgets. NGOs, charities and universities have often been left to fit in around the edges even though their people are frequently the ones going to the high risk countries. I’ve spent a lot of time having that conversation, and I wanted to share where I’ve landed on it. Q1. What problem did you keep seeing that made you feel, “Someone has to fix this for smaller organisations and NGOs”? When we speak with smaller organisations and NGOs, we hear the same thing again and again. When they hear us talk about a Travel Risk Management (TRM) programme, most of them don’t feel their organisation is big enough for this kind of programme, because it sounds and feels built for large corporates with huge budgets. And I understand why they feel that way, much of the travel risk management space has traditionally been aimed at enterprise-level programmes: dedicated security teams with GSOC, complex reporting structures, and expensive platforms. But the reality is, some of the organisations travelling into the most challenging environments are actually the smaller ones – NGOs, research teams, volunteers, and universities doing fieldwork. They still have a duty of care. That gap really stayed with me. I kept thinking, these organisations shouldn’t be the ones with the least support. Q2. Can you share a moment or case that really crystallised why better travel risk management is non-negotiable for these organisations? I have a lot of real-life stories to share. A couple of years ago, my son went on a school trip to the Lake District. By day two, half the kids were sick. By day four, a teacher was unwell as well, and the trip had to be cut short. One of the parents called the hostel afterward and discovered that the same outbreak had happened the week before with a different group. A simple pre-trip assessment would have caught this. When providing a pre-travel assessment, it shouldn’t be generic or based on a template used for everyone. It needs to be bespoke to the individuals, the trip, the group, and the destination. That experience stuck with me, because the principle is the same whether you’re sending young student to the Lake District or staff into Mozambique. You do the homework, and with an organisation like ours, we help you source all relevant risk assessments for your trip or assignment. Q3. How does your own background in TRM shape the way you’ve designed this service? My focus across EMEA at World Travel Protection (WTP) has been to ensure all organisations, regardless of their size, have access to a Travel Risk Management programme. When I’m helping to put a programme together, I always start by asking: Who is travelling? Where are they going? What are they actually doing? The answers to these three questions shape everything about what they need. This tailored approach ensures our service is both relevant and effective for each client. Q4. When you speak to smaller organisations, NGOs or universities, what do they tell you they are struggling with most around travel risk? A few things come up over and over. They’re not always sure where to start, or what “good” even looks like. There’s rarely someone whose actual job is travel risk – it’s usually tucked into someone’s existing role on top of everything else. And it’s often fragmented: an insurance policy here, a country guide there, a WhatsApp group for emergencies, no clear picture of where everyone is. Universities have it more complex still, because they’re managing students, researchers and staff all going to different places at the same time. Q5. What risks do you see these organisations carrying today that they often underestimate or don’t see at all? The big one is assuming travel insurance is travel risk management. It really isn’t. Insurance pays out after something’s gone wrong; travel risk management is the work of stopping it going wrong in the first place. Another important aspect is the legal side. Duty of care now extends to volunteers, contractors, consultants, and students, not just full-time employees. And traveller wellbeing is often the quietest risk. People may return from emotionally challenging trips with no support in place. Depending on the assignment, some travellers might experience or witness life-threatening incidents yet receive little assistance afterwards. Q6. What’s at stake for them if they continue with “good enough” or informal approaches to TRM? Worst case, someone gets hurt and the organisation can’t show what reasonable steps it took to prevent it. This also leave an open space for donors to start asking harder questions, partners want evidence the organisation can’t produce, and the people who actually do the travelling stop trusting anyone has their back. That last one shouldn’t be underestimated. Once you lose trust, it’s very hard to win it back. Q7. In simple, non-technical language, how would you describe what this new service makes possible for a small organisation? It gives smaller organisations the same kind of support other biggest companies rely on: 24/7, 365 days a year access to in-house medical and security assistance by experts. They have access to pre-travel and post-travel assessments, as well as real-time intelligence about what’s happening wherever their people are without needing to build it themselves. They get our app, our portal, our Command Centres, and our medical and security team. There’s no need to hire anyone or purchase separate software. Q8. If you had to sum it up in one sentence, what is the core promise behind this service? In my own words “Real travel risk management, shaped around your organisation so your people can do the work they came to do, and come home safely”. Q9. Rather than features, what experiences do you want your clients to have when they work with you on TRM? I want the head of operations at a small NGO to feel less alone the next time something happens

Why smaller NGOs and universities deserve travel risk management built for them Read More »

Scholarship Students

Travel Risk Academy Scholarship: Meet Our Level 4 Recipients

We’re proud to introduce the four recipients of our Level 4 ATHE Award in Travel Risk Management scholarship: Mohammad Shafi Waris, Deborah Nwaukwa, Allan Kyeyune, and Daisy Barnham Selected from a highly competitive global pool, these individuals represent not only exceptional talent, but also the diverse perspectives that are essential to shaping the future of Travel Risk Management (TRM). A Truly Global Cohort This inaugural scholarship intake brings together professionals from the UK, Uganda, Afghanistan, and Nigeria – a reflection of the global nature of TRM today. “We’re delighted to welcome students from across the world into our inaugural intake. At our core, we believe that Travel Risk Management is a truly global discipline — one that thrives through diverse perspectives. These students have been practising TRM in their own ways for years, and we’re proud to now equip them with the tools and frameworks to further develop and advance TRM practices within their countries, and for generations to come.”Bex Deadman, Co-founder, Travel Risk Academy Powered by Partnership The Travel Risk Academy initially committed to funding two scholarships for the March cohort. Thanks to the generous support of AHNA Group, we were able to double this number — awarding a total of four fully funded places. This kind of collaboration is what makes meaningful, global impact possible. A Strong Global Response Interest in the scholarship programme has been overwhelming. We received applications from across the globe, including: Afghanistan, Brazil, Canada, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Nigeria, Uganda, the UK, and the USA. This level of engagement highlights both the growing demand for TRM education and the importance of making it accessible worldwide. Now Inviting New Partners We are now opening the door to a limited number of organisations interested in sponsoring future scholarships. By partnering with Travel Risk Academy, you can: ✔ Support the global development of Travel Risk Management✔ Expand access to training for professionals who may otherwise be excluded✔ Strengthen your reputation as a values-driven organisation✔ Build meaningful connections within a fast-growing TRM community Sponsorship Options 1 place – £699.99 + VAT 5+ places – 5% discount 10+ places – 10% discount Enquire: en*******@***************my.com Applications Now Open: September Intake We are now accepting applications for our September scholarship intake. If you’re passionate about advancing Travel Risk Management in your region and want to gain a globally recognised qualification, we encourage you to apply. ???? Apply here >

Travel Risk Academy Scholarship: Meet Our Level 4 Recipients Read More »

TRA Guides

When the Threat Travels With Your People: AI-Enabled Fraud and the Duty of Care Gap

The Moment of Maximum Vulnerability Crisis disruption does not simply strand travellers. It creates the conditions in which they are most susceptible to manipulation. When flights are cancelled, rebooking queues are overwhelmed and official guidance is fragmented, travellers do what comes naturally: they search for help, they post on social media, they click on links that appear to offer resolution. Fraudsters understand this behaviour precisely because it is predictable, and they have learned to exploit it at scale. The Middle East conflict of early 2026 produced a textbook case study. Within days of widespread flight disruption across the Gulf, a coordinated wave of AI-assisted fraud activity targeted passengers of Emirates, Etihad and Qatar Airways. The techniques deployed were not crude. They were architecturally sophisticated, operationally fast and, in several cases, difficult to distinguish from legitimate airline communications. For corporate travel risk managers and duty of care professionals, this is not a consumer issue that sits at arm’s length. It is an operational exposure with direct liability implications. Four Attack Vectors Your Travellers Are Facing 1. Fake Social Media Accounts Impersonating Airlines On the platform X, fraudsters constructed accounts using airline branding, logos and generic service-oriented names such as “Support Team”, “Quick Response Team” or “Guest Services Care.” These accounts actively monitored public posts from distressed passengers and replied directly, initiating contact under the appearance of legitimate assistance. Santander UK’s fraud team confirmed it had already received reports from customers caught in this pattern. Etihad Airways issued a formal advisory on 11 March 2026 confirming the existence of multiple fake accounts impersonating the airline, and clarified that its only verified accounts on X are @Etihad and @EtihadHelp. The mechanics of the scam followed a consistent pattern: the passenger is drawn into a direct message exchange, asked to confirm personal and contact details, then directed to a money transfer application under the pretence of receiving a refund. Instead, funds are debited. Duty of care implication: Your travellers are searching for help in real time, often on personal devices, using personal accounts. Their interactions with apparent airline support are invisible to your travel management infrastructure. There is no trigger in your booking or tracking platform that flags this exposure. 2. AI-Generated Identities Used to Fabricate Credibility Bellingcat’s investigation into the case of “Tamara Harema”, published on 12 March 2026, documented a more elaborate variant. An interview was published in De Telegraaf, the Netherlands’ largest newspaper, featuring a woman claiming to organise private evacuation flights from Dubai at €1,600 per seat. The article reached the desk of the Dutch Foreign Affairs Minister. Subsequent analysis found multiple AI generation artefacts in the published photograph: distorted architectural features inconsistent with the actual Burj Khalifa, a furniture anomaly, blurring on clothing and an earring that appeared to merge into the subject’s face. Flight-tracking data from Flightradar24 confirmed that no aircraft matching the described A321 departed Muscat bound for the Netherlands on the stated dates. The source who introduced “Harema” to the newspaper was a Dubai-based lawyer with a documented history of fraud-related insolvency proceedings in the Netherlands. The fraud did not require a sophisticated technical operation. It required a convincing AI-generated image, a plausible narrative, and a trusted intermediary willing to make an introduction. In a crisis environment, those three ingredients are readily assembled. Duty of care implication: When a traveller cannot secure a seat on a repatriation flight, they will seek alternatives. An AI-generated persona offering charter capacity at a credible price point, promoted through a credible channel, is indistinguishable from a legitimate operator to someone under stress and time pressure. 3. Fraudulent Refund Links Distributed via Social and Email Both Emirates and Etihad issued explicit warnings against sharing booking information, contact details or payment data in response to social media posts. The UAE Ministry of Interior separately warned on 4 March 2026 against fraudulent emails purporting to offer emergency registration, compensation or insurance, which directed recipients to fake forms designed to harvest personal and financial data. Abu Dhabi Police confirmed that fraudsters deliberately target periods of travel disruption, when passengers are actively expecting communications from airlines and official bodies, making fraudulent messages proportionally more convincing. Duty of care implication: Travellers with corporate bookings are likely to use corporate payment instruments. A successful refund scam executed through a corporate card or virtual payment credential creates both a financial exposure and a data breach event. 4. AI-Generated Service Listings Beyond the Airline Channel While not specific to the current crisis, Bellingcat’s March 2025 analysis of AI-generated product fraud on platforms including Amazon, eBay and Etsy documents the systematic use of AI-generated imagery to misrepresent goods. The techniques identified, including image inconsistencies, missing product angles, implausible pricing and fictitious seller identities, are directly transferable to the sale of fake travel services: non-existent hotel accommodation, fabricated airport transfers and fraudulent visa facilitation. During a regional crisis, demand for any available service spikes sharply. Travellers will book accommodation, ground transport and logistical support through channels they would not ordinarily use. The fraud surface expands accordingly. Why This Is a Technology and Governance Problem, Not Just User Behaviour It is tempting to frame this as a traveller awareness issue, which it partly is. However, the underlying challenge is structural. AI-generated content has crossed the threshold at which visual and contextual plausibility can no longer be reliably assessed by an individual under cognitive stress. The Harema case demonstrates this clearly: the photograph deceived a professional newsroom long enough to be published and cited at ministerial level. The expectation that a distressed traveller, operating alone, on a mobile device, in an unfamiliar environment, will perform rigorous open-source verification before clicking a link or making a payment is not a reasonable control. Corporate travel risk programmes that rely on traveller awareness as their primary defence against AI-enabled fraud are operating with an inadequate control architecture. What Robust Organisational Controls Look Like Travel risk managers and technology leads should be examining the following areas: Pre-trip briefing, updated for AI fraud vectors. Travellers operating in elevated-risk regions should receive explicit, scenario-based guidance

When the Threat Travels With Your People: AI-Enabled Fraud and the Duty of Care Gap Read More »

TRA 2025 Review

2025 Review: Building the Future of Travel Risk & Travel Optimisation

As we wrap up another remarkable year, we want to extend our heartfelt gratitude for your continued support. With the festive season in full swing, we’re excited to share our end-of-year review – highlighting key moments and milestones, along with a few updates and warm wishes as we head into 2026. A Landmark Achievement for the Industry This year marked a genuine “I was there” moment for the industry. The world’s first formal certification in Travel Risk Management at Level 4 was awarded to Andrew Lowe, Travel Risk Manager at BP. He became the first graduate of the Travel Risk Academy ATHE Level 4 Award in Travel Risk Management. As a result, he has set a new benchmark for professional standards in the field. This global first reinforces Travel Risk Academy’s mission to educate, inspire and qualify those responsible for keeping travellers safe. It also supports organisations in building effective and optimised travel programmes. Evolving Qualifications: Level 5 Moves Into Beta Building on the success of Level 4, the ATHE Level 5 Award in Travel Risk Management has now entered beta testing. A highly engaged group of Travel Risk Managers and practitioners are taking part. These Level 5 beta cohorts are working closely with Travel Risk Academy to refine, stress-test and adapt the programme. Their goal is to ensure the course truly reflects the realities of today’s complex, tech-enabled and fast-changing world. Their feedback is shaping content around ISO31030, cross-functional collaboration and Travel Optimisation Management. Consequently, Level 5 is becoming not only academically robust but also practically indispensable. Communities Regrouping for 2026 The Travel Risk Academy Communities remain central to how TRA turns learning into action. They also drive meaningful industry-wide change. Throughout the year, our DEI and Technology & Data communities met regularly to explore how identity, health, automation, data integration and AI continue to reshape the traveller risk landscape. These communities are now regrouping and re-evaluating their aims. They are preparing for a refreshed relaunch in January 2026, with clearer objectives, more structured projects and greater opportunities for members to contribute and lead. Learning, Events and Membership in 2025 Throughout 2025, Travel Risk Academy expanded its portfolio of courses, workshops and webinars. These covered every stage of the TRM learning journey, from introductory ISO31030 training to the ATHE Level 4 and Level 5 qualifications. The Travel Optimisation Management Summit (TOMS Week) returned in May as an immersive online experience. It brought together professionals from around the world to explore how to reduce risk while optimising travel programmes. Through Travel Risk Academy Membership, individuals and organisations gained access to webinars, workshops, resources and community groups. This support helped members move beyond tick-box compliance and develop truly optimised, resilient travel programmes. Co-Founder Reflections Bex Deadman, Co-Founder “From humble beginnings, 2025 has been a year of delivery. We are incredibly proud of our first students joining the Level 4 and Level 5 TRM Qualification cohorts. This milestone is the first step in meaningfully professionalising TRM, and supporting this community has been our honour.” Sara McKenna, Co-Founder “2025 was a year of discovery and genuine delivery for Travel Risk Academy. Our qualifications sit at the heart of all we do. I believe our approach – leading with the heart – will help the TRA become a true professional home as Travel Risk Management evolves into Travel Optimisation Management. A huge thank-you to our learners, mentors, speakers, partners and clients for their trust and energy. We look forward to even more innovation in 2026.” Simon Crane, Co-Founder “2025 was a landmark year for Travel Risk Academy. Our first student achieved the ATHE Level 4 Award in Travel Risk Management — the only independently accredited qualification of its kind worldwide. This milestone demonstrates the importance of these awards and the rising demand for professional development in travel risk management. We are thrilled to see more highly experienced managers preparing to enrol for the Level 4 and Level 5 Awards in 2026.” Looking Ahead: An Invitation to Join Us As Travel Risk Academy grows, the focus remains clear: to be the centre of excellence where TRM professionals learn, share, test ideas and co-create the future of Travel Risk and Travel Optimisation Management. In 2026, TRA will continue expanding its learning platform, membership programme, communities and events. More people will have the opportunity to gain accredited qualifications and help shape how organisations manage travel risk. Whether you are already part of the TRA family, considering formal TRM training or just beginning to explore the field, you are warmly invited to join the movement and help shape what comes next.

2025 Review: Building the Future of Travel Risk & Travel Optimisation Read More »

TRM Level 4 Graduate

A Global First: Andrew Lowe becomes the World’s First Graduate of the Travel Risk Academy ATHE Level 4 Qualification in Travel Risk Management.

Andrew Lowe of BP becomes the World’s First Graduate of the Travel Risk Academy ATHE Level 4 Qualification in Travel Risk Management. We are proud to announce a major milestone: Andrew Lowe, Travel Risk Manager at BP, has become the first person to achieve the Travel Risk Academy Level 4 Qualification in Travel Risk Management, independently accredited by ATHE. This moment marks a significant step forward for a profession that is rapidly gaining recognition as essential to global business resilience, duty of care and organisational security. A trailblazer for the profession Andrew’s path into Travel Risk Management began within BP’s Global Security Operations Centre (GSOC), where he helped define what TRM should look like for one of the world’s largest energy companies. From mapping global travel risks to creating frameworks and embedding best practice, his work has set a benchmark for modern Travel Risk Management roles. By becoming the world’s first graduate of the Travel Risk Academy ATHE Level 4 qualification, Andrew has demonstrated how structured training and accreditation can elevate both individual capability and organisational confidence. Andrew commented on his learning journey: “This qualification is a milestone in my journey as a travel risk manager, helping to both solidify and expand my knowledge and experience. Certification is especially important at a time when the profession is being increasingly measured against ISO 31030.” He added that the course provided clarity, structure, and challenge: “The self-paced format worked very well around a busy schedule. The tutorials were invaluable for validating and at times challenging my understanding, prompting real self-reflection.” In recognition of his dedication and pioneering achievement, we are delighted to welcome Andrew as a Travel Risk Academy Ambassador. A new era for travel risk professionals With this announcement, Travel Risk Academy is opening enrolment globally for its ATHE Level 4 and Level 5 Qualifications in Travel Risk Management – offering a clear, accredited pathway for those responsible for keeping travellers safe in an increasingly complex world. With special thanks to our Level 4 sponsors; WorkFlex, Terrain 9, Compass Point Assist, Voyage Manager and Sectrn. For more information on both our Level 4 and Level 5 Travel Risk Management Qualifications, visit >

A Global First: Andrew Lowe becomes the World’s First Graduate of the Travel Risk Academy ATHE Level 4 Qualification in Travel Risk Management. Read More »

Thierry TRA Blog

Is Your Emergency Plan Missing a Pulse? The Case for Medical Support

Do Organisations including, Security Managers Forget About Medical Assistance? Is that an insightful or inflammatory question?  TRA Mentor Thierry Montrieux gives us his considered opinion and some trips on addressing it if the answer is anything other than NO. Security managers focus heavily on threats like theft, violence, cyberattacks, or physical intrusions—but medical assistance can sometimes get overlooked by the organisations. From my experience a few of the common reasons why this happens are: Perceived Scope of Responsibility Many security managers view their role primarily as preventing security breaches, not handling health or safety. They assume medical emergencies fall under HR, health & safety, external emergency services or their designated emergency medical assistance company if one is appointed directly or via an insurance policy. Training Bias Security training often emphasises surveillance, access control, and emergency response for hostile threats. General first aid and medical response may be optional or underemphasised, so it doesn’t stay front of mind. Reactive vs. Preventive Mindset Security teams often operate in a reactive mode, preparing for intrusions or incidents. Medical events (like heart attacks, asthma, or fainting) can feel less predictable and thus get pushed aside, even though they’re statistically more likely. Budget & Resource Allocation Companies often allocate resources to visible security measures (guards, cameras, alarms) rather than medical preparedness (AEDs, first aid kits, staff training). Over-reliance on Emergency Services Security managers sometimes assume that calling the emergency service is “enough,” forgetting that in many emergencies (e.g., cardiac arrest), the first few minutes of on-site response matter most. Cultural Factors In some organisations, there’s a culture of separating “safety” and “security.” This silo effect leads to gaps in holistic emergency planning. Statistically, medical emergencies are far more common in workplaces than violent intrusions, so integrating medical preparedness into security planning makes organisations safer. Whilst there are no published statistics experience tells me for every 100 incidents around 99 will be for some sort of medical emergency ranging from the simple cut to the life threatening. To help, I have put together some practical steps security managers can take to make sure medical assistance isn’t overlooked in their emergency planning: 1. Integrate Medical Response into Security Protocols Add medical emergencies (heart attacks, seizures, allergic reactions, injuries) into the same emergency response playbooks used for fire or security threats. Treat “first aid readiness” like fire extinguishers or CCTV — something that needs inspection, upkeep, and drills. 2. Train Security Personnel in First Aid Require at least basic First Aid, CPR, and AED training for all security staff.  Build this into your TRM training package. Make refresher courses mandatory (skills fade quickly if not practiced). Encourage cross-training with health & safety teams. 3. Equip the Environment Ensure AEDs (defibrillators) and first aid kits are strategically placed and checked regularly. Include trauma kits (tourniquets, pressure bandages) in areas where workplace accidents or active threats are possible. 4. Improve Communication & Coordination Establish a clear medical emergency chain of command (who calls EMS, who assists the patient, who manages crowd control). Make sure any security guards know how to guide paramedics quickly to the scene (lost minutes in large facilities are critical). Who contacts the medical assistance company and when 5. Run Joint Drills Include medical scenarios in emergency drills (e.g., simulated heart attack in the lobby, choking in the cafeteria). Involve your medical assistance company or consult a medical assistance industry expert. This makes response smoother and reduces hesitation during real incidents. 6. Leverage Technology Some security systems can integrate with panic buttons or health monitoring wearables for lone workers. CCTV operators can be trained to spot medical distress (slumping, collapsing, seizure-like activity). 7. Break Down the “Silo Mentality” Collaborate with HR, health & safety officers, and local emergency services, your medical assistance company or consult a medical assistance industry expert. Security should see themselves not just as protectors from external threats, but as first responders in all emergencies. By reframing “security” as protection of life first,  vulnerabilities second, medical preparedness becomes a natural extension of the role. Here’s a short checklist security managers could use directly in their planning, or more of a policy guide that could be adopted at an organisational level. Security & Medical Assistance Checklist 1. Training All security staff trained in First Aid, CPR, AED use Regular refresher courses scheduled Cross-training with Health & Safety team 2. Equipment AEDs installed in high-traffic areas and checked monthly First aid kits fully stocked and inspected Trauma kits available where high-risk incidents may occur 3. Procedures Medical emergencies included in security protocols Clear chain of command for medical incidents Defined role for security: first aid, scene control, EMS escort 4. Drills & Coordination Regular medical emergency drills conducted Security staff know how to guide EMS quickly to incident location Coordination established with local hospitals/EMS 5. Communication & Awareness Emergency numbers posted and known to all staff Security can communicate calmly and clearly under stress CCTV/monitoring staff trained to spot signs of distress 6. Culture & Responsibility Security team recognizes role as first responders Medical preparedness seen as equal priority to threat response Collaboration with HR & Safety teams maintained Never be afraid to seek, help, support and advice from people that have the experience to build the knowledge you need to provide the duty of care for your teams and staff.

Is Your Emergency Plan Missing a Pulse? The Case for Medical Support Read More »

Bruce - TRA Mentor Blog

TRA Guide to Travel Optimization

TRA Guide to Travel Optimization At the Travel Risk Academy, we frequently discuss the importance of optimizing travel programs. In fact, our annual summit is dedicated to this very topic. But what exactly do we mean when we talk about Travel Optimization Management (TOM)? In this article, we’ll unpack the concept of TOM with TRA Mentor Bruce McIndoe and offer suggestions on how to apply it within your own organization. More Than Just Cost Management Before diving in, let’s make one thing clear: optimizing a travel program goes far beyond simply managing costs. Travel is a business and organization enabler. At its core, TOM encompasses two equally important areas of focus. Stakeholder Engagement Effective travel optimization requires collaboration across multiple departments. This means involving stakeholders from various parts of the organization, including HR, Procurement, Security, Risk Management, Audit, QHSE, Finance, Travel, Mobility, Facilities & Fleet, Marketing and Events, Cybersecurity, Data Security, Legal, Operations, Insurance, DEI, Sustainability, C-suite leadership, and, of course, the travelers, bookers, and approvers who interact with the program daily. These diverse perspectives ensure that the travel program is aligned with the broader needs and priorities of the organization. Alignment with Organizational Objectives Optimizing a travel program also involves aligning your travel strategy with your organization’s broader objectives. Travel is an enabler and a critical function in achieving these objectives. By integrating your organization’s culture and values into areas like traveler safety, wellbeing, and sustainability, you can create a travel program that supports the organization’s mission on multiple levels. A Strategic Approach Yields Long-Term Gains While this organization-wide approach may sound challenging, it’s important to recognize that the effort put in at the outset will return benefits over time. As a travel program evolves into strategic alignment with the organization rather than a cost center, the costs we are so eager to control naturally fall into line with a clear linkage back to the organization’s objectives. Contrary to popular belief, optimizing your travel program does not necessarily mean spending large sums on technology or external consultants. The beauty of TOM lies in fully understanding what you already have in place. By thoroughly analyzing the current program, clearly aligning it to the organization’s stakeholders, and identifying gaps, you can begin to make meaningful improvements and start reaping the longer-term benefits. Beyond Spreadsheets: A Holistic View of Your Travel Program Optimization won’t happen by simply crunching numbers in a spreadsheet. It requires a hands-on approach—one that involves rolling up your sleeves and getting familiar with every element of the program. This includes those aspects that may have been overlooked, as well as those that appear to be working fine but could benefit from further refinement. By staying open-minded and willing to go the extra mile in your due diligence, you can identify opportunities that might have otherwise been missed. The result is an optimized travel program that puts people at the heart of every decision, ultimately contributing to your organization achieving its goals—sometimes in ways you had not considered. To get you started we have put together our top tips on Travel Optimization Management. 1. Engage Stakeholders Across the Organization Optimizing a travel programme isn’t just the job of the travel team—it requires input from all relevant stakeholders across the organization. As listed at the top of this article, this can include HR, finance, security, compliance, and the travelers themselves. Consider creating a Travel Council or Travel Optimization Team (TOT). Involving stakeholders is crucial in: Understanding needs and priorities: Different departments may have different priorities. Finance may focus on cost control, while HR may prioritize traveler well-being and security and look after recruitment and often mobility.  Your marketing team may be responsible for running events and have a different set of needs and risks, they can also help you communicate the programme internally. Creating a collaborative framework: By engaging everyone in the process, you can build a travel programme that meets the needs of both the organization and its travelers, leading to better buy-in and compliance. Mapping current versus future state: Stakeholders can help you define where your travel program is today versus where it needs to be. Their feedback can help map a clear path toward achieving an optimized travel programme that serves the goals of the organization and the safety of its people. Your Travel Optimization Team will become your Travel Optimization champions; they can link to other committees or report to the C-Suite and take ownership of the direction of the program. 2. Conduct a Thorough Analysis of Your Current Program Before optimization, a comprehensive analysis of your existing travel programme is crucial. This involves: Conduct a SWOT for each functional area. “Why do we travel?” and “How do we enable safe travel?” What is their value proposition for travel and is the travel programme helping achieve it? Evaluating current policies and procedures: Are they clear, up to date, and effective? How are they being communicated, across all stakeholders.  Identify any gaps or areas that need improvement. Measuring performance: Analyze the collection and assessment of key metrics like traveler satisfaction, policy compliance, travel-related incidents, and cost efficiency. Mapping pain points: Talk to travelers, travel arrangers, and other stakeholders to uncover bottlenecks or issues, such as confusing policies or slow response times during emergencies. This analysis will help you understand where your programme currently stands and provide insights into areas that need to be adjusted or optimized. 3. Understand Your Supplier Partners and Their Services and Capabilities It’s essential to have a deep understanding of the services and capabilities that your supplier partners provide, how they overlap, and where there are gaps. You may have several partners offering similar services, such as traveler tracking tools, global mobility, visa and immigration, meetings and events, online booking tools, security alerts, or insurance/emergency assistance. A clear understanding of these overlaps will help you: Reduce redundancy: If multiple suppliers offer similar services, you can eliminate overlap and streamline your program. For example, you might find that two partners offer traveler tracking,

TRA Guide to Travel Optimization Read More »

Patience - TRA Mentor Guide

Bridging Silos in TRM: 5 Key Steps to Keep Employees Safe

Bridging Silos in Travel Risk Management: 5 Key Steps to Keep Employees Safe As companies expand globally, the need for a solid travel risk management programme becomes more critical. Yet, establishing this programme can be challenging, especially when departments like People Management, Vendor Management, Corporate Mobility, and Security have their own goals and responsibilities. These silos can lead to communication gaps, misaligned priorities, and missed opportunities to keep employees safe and supported. Now more than ever, leaders are seeking ways to foster collaboration for more effective travel risk management. Without aligned strategies and open communication, essential travel safety initiatives can face delays or even be compromised. Bridging silos is crucial to keeping travel risk management efficient, responsive, and proactive. Why Silos Are Hard to Bridge — and Why They Matter in Travel Risk Management Silos naturally form as organisations grow and teams have specialised goals. By bridging these silos, companies can create an organised, effective travel risk management programme. Here are five key steps to help teams work together seamlessly. 5 Steps to Bridge Silos in Travel Risk Management Align Leadership Across Departments Effective travel risk management programme needs a unified approach driven from the top. Leaders from People Management, Vendor Management, Corporate Mobility, and Security should regularly meet to create a shared vision and align on travel risk priorities. Forming a cross-departmental leadership team or steering committee helps ensure that each department understands its role in keeping travellers safe and how it fits into the company’s larger goals. Build Cross-Functional Travel Risk Teams Combining insights is essential for a comprehensive travel risk strategy. These cross-functional teams allow each department to share expertise. This collaborative approach results in travel programmes and policies that are both safer and more effective for everyone involved. Define Clear Roles and Responsibilities When multiple departments work together, roles can overlap. Define each team’s responsibilities within a travel risk management programme to ensure clarity. Clear roles help teams stay organised and focused on their unique responsibilities. Appoint Co-Leaders from Each Department For travel risk projects that require deep collaboration, appointing co-leaders from different departments helps balance priorities. For example, co-leaders from People Management and Vendor Management can ensure employee well-being and cost-efficiency, while a Security co-leader ensures that thorough risk assessments are factored in. This co-leadership model supports a balanced approach to decision-making. Prioritise Travel Risk Training Across Departments Travel risk training is essential for equipping teams to support and protect employees effectively. Training ensures that each department understands travel risk protocols, their specific responsibilities, and the resources available for travellers. When employees are trained to work together across departments, they’re better prepared to act swiftly, manage emergencies, and collaborate effectively in high-stakes situations. This unified approach to training also builds a stronger, more informed travel risk management culture across the organisation. The Path to a Strong, Unified Travel Risk Management Programme Building a strong travel risk management programme is essential for ensuring employee safety in an unpredictable world. By adopting these five strategies and prioritising training, organisations can create a cohesive programme that is flexible, responsive, and prepared to tackle the challenges of a constantly changing environment. This approach will help companies to stay resilient and ensure the safety of employees, no matter where they travel.

Bridging Silos in TRM: 5 Key Steps to Keep Employees Safe Read More »

TRM - ISO31030

ISO31030 and Certification: What Organizations Need to Know

In today’s global business environment, protecting employees during business travel is more critical than ever. ISO31030:2021, the international standard for Travel Risk Management (TRM), has emerged as a vital framework for organizations looking to enhance their TRM practices. But there’s often confusion about certification—let’s clear that up. Understanding what ISO31030:2021 is all about ISO31030 serves as a comprehensive guide for organizations to Develop and implement effective travel risk management programs Meet duty of care obligations Protect employees during business travel Identify and address organizational and traveller needs Protect the organization’s assets while travelling Enhance the performance of the Travel Management programme The standard offers experienced travel risk and security managers a valuable benchmark to test and improve existing processes. It also provides a structured framework for organizations starting from scratch, helping them build a robust TRM program that can deliver value immediately and grow and adapt to the organization’s needs. The structure and detail it provides specifically address the business travel sector, and the standard helps the Travel Manager identify and address the risks to the traveller and, importantly, the organization. ISO31030:2021 is based on the world’s most influential risk management standard, ISO 31000:2018. This also means it easily fits into your current working practices, complements existing risk management programmes, and seamlessly interacts with Security, Information Security and Health and Safety programmes. By adopting the standard, you will not only improve your Travel Management programme for travellers but also add to the organization’s security and resilience. The cherry on top is that the standards approach helps manage costs, can increase the overall value gained from business travel, and demonstrates to stakeholders, including the Courts, that you take ‘Duty of Care’ seriously. ISO 31030 improves travel management, keeps people safer and happier, and helps you deliver better performance for all stakeholders. ISO and the Certification Question Here’s what you need to know about ISO31030 certification.  It can get a little technical, but bear with me! Firstly, let’s cover the basics: who is ISO? ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, brings global experts together to agree on the best way to do things — from making a product to managing a process. As one of the oldest non-governmental international organizations, ISO has enabled trade and cooperation between people and companies the world over since 1946. The International Standards published by ISO serve to make lives easier, safer, and better. ISO31030 is an International Standard (IS). It is recognised around the world and has the weight and credibility of the world’s largest standards body behind it, and now you.  ISO comprises around 170 member countries, and the standards produced truly provide relevant good practice guidance that underpins global trade. Broadly speaking, standards come in three general types. The first two are International Standards (IS) and Management Systems Standards (MSS). There are also a number of other publications that are generally less formal, such as Technical Reports and Specifications and Handbooks. ISO members can propose new standards activities to a technical committee, which is then balloted across the membership. International Standards (IS) are intended to provide good practice guidance on a subject area that is clearly defined in the standard’s scope. For ISO 31030, this is Travel Risk Management.  While there is a clear framework within the standard, with tons of advice and guidance, users are free to select how they implement the standard based on their needs and level of maturity or experience. International Standards are, by their very nature, designed to help improve your processes and performance. Flexibility is built in, enabling you to grow and develop your programme as needed and in line with your available resources.  How we developed ISO 31030 allows organizations to benchmark or perform a GAP analysis efficiently to quickly see where improvements can be made to current activities or where necessary capabilities may be missing.  From my experience, most travel managers have a decent proportion of the basics in place, especially relating to booking and purchasing, but often lack the broader capabilities needed to meet the Duty of Care. There can also be gaps around incident response, information security, and healthcare that often end up causing serious issues. The guidance offered by ISO 31030 allows for a pretty adaptable approach across the activities and processes you use. When you use a guidance standard, you get to choose what elements to apply and why. It is mainly for internal use, and while you can check or ‘audit’ the programme, the baseline is largely based on what you have decided is important.  Generally speaking, a Management System Standard (MSS) is different. It can provide some of the flexibility of an IS, but its focus is more on ensuring processes work as intended and performance is as expected. A formally defined ISO assurance process can be used to check what is happening in the real world and that it meets the organisation’s expectations. Standards like ISO 9001, ISO 45001, and ISO 27001 are great examples of the MSS approach to standards. By using MSS standards, organizations can improve the quality of their products and services and provide evidence to a wide variety of stakeholders that they are meeting the expectations laid out in each standard. Many choose to certify their processes not to gain a simple piece of paper but to confirm that they can be trusted to deliver for customers time after time. In some markets, certification can almost be mandatory. While many seek formal certification, others choose not to certify and instead use the MSS as a powerful management tool that provides similar benefits without the extra effort needed to obtain it. There is a quick point that needs to be made. ISO does not perform certification or issue certificates, nor permit anyone to use the ISO logo in connection with certification. Certification is performed by external certification bodies, thus a company or organization cannot be certified by ISO. Independent certification bodies (CBs) certify ISO management system standards. These bodies are accredited by the International Accreditation Forum (IAF)

ISO31030 and Certification: What Organizations Need to Know Read More »

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top